<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crappy Predictions about the Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unbeknownst.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unbeknownst.net/?p=234</link>
	<description>Economics, technology, and the goo that binds them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 04:40:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reasons Unbeknownst &#187; Some interesting links and furry dogs</title>
		<link>http://unbeknownst.net/?p=234&#038;cpage=1#comment-74731</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasons Unbeknownst &#187; Some interesting links and furry dogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unbeknownst.net/?p=234#comment-74731</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m slowly piecing together what may be my longest post ever covering some predictions I have about technology, culture, etc. I figure I&#8217;m going to criticize PC Magazines vision it&#8217;s only fair to post my own. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m slowly piecing together what may be my longest post ever covering some predictions I have about technology, culture, etc. I figure I&#8217;m going to criticize PC Magazines vision it&#8217;s only fair to post my own. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://unbeknownst.net/?p=234&#038;cpage=1#comment-74115</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unbeknownst.net/?p=234#comment-74115</guid>
		<description>#7. I agree. The IPv6 address space could assign an address to each &quot;phone&quot; on the planet, so why go back and assign each one another ten-digit number for historical reasons, when it would be much easier for users to just implement a real-name directory system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#7. I agree. The IPv6 address space could assign an address to each &#8220;phone&#8221; on the planet, so why go back and assign each one another ten-digit number for historical reasons, when it would be much easier for users to just implement a real-name directory system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAS</title>
		<link>http://unbeknownst.net/?p=234&#038;cpage=1#comment-74055</link>
		<dc:creator>MAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unbeknownst.net/?p=234#comment-74055</guid>
		<description>Great post!  I don&#039;t think I&#039;m ever going to look at a prediction article again without thinking about how you ripped this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m ever going to look at a prediction article again without thinking about how you ripped this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cool</title>
		<link>http://unbeknownst.net/?p=234&#038;cpage=1#comment-74041</link>
		<dc:creator>cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unbeknownst.net/?p=234#comment-74041</guid>
		<description>1. I agree with you here, so far there is no real world normal single-user application that needs that ...
2. I agree it will not change the world - but notebooks will get better :)
3. WiMAX - well, in theory it sounds good ... until you realize it is NOT the same &#039;model&#039; as WiFi, it is the same model as existing cellphones :( I would rather see cooperative WiFi in urban areas ...
4. Agree.
5. Laser is still unbeatable in many things ... cost on the long term beeing one of them :) But I guess that certain companies would love to see laser dying and leaving the market captive to inkjet that costs more than gold or high-end champagne ...
6. Agree.
7. You had me at &#039;open standards&#039; :))
8. It remains to be seen ...
9. Actually in the long term those will get accepted - today the pilots of the modern planes already can&#039;t fly without the technology ...
10. Also don&#039;t forget the limited resolution of the human eye ... and that already HDTV is mostly hype-driven ...
11. Mostly agree ... even if new technologies might also help ...
12. I agree, but you do realize that for every consumer with a brain there are at least ten morons just dying to buy the latest gizmo from SteveJ :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. I agree with you here, so far there is no real world normal single-user application that needs that &#8230;<br />
2. I agree it will not change the world &#8211; but notebooks will get better :)<br />
3. WiMAX &#8211; well, in theory it sounds good &#8230; until you realize it is NOT the same &#8216;model&#8217; as WiFi, it is the same model as existing cellphones :( I would rather see cooperative WiFi in urban areas &#8230;<br />
4. Agree.<br />
5. Laser is still unbeatable in many things &#8230; cost on the long term beeing one of them :) But I guess that certain companies would love to see laser dying and leaving the market captive to inkjet that costs more than gold or high-end champagne &#8230;<br />
6. Agree.<br />
7. You had me at &#8216;open standards&#8217; :))<br />
8. It remains to be seen &#8230;<br />
9. Actually in the long term those will get accepted &#8211; today the pilots of the modern planes already can&#8217;t fly without the technology &#8230;<br />
10. Also don&#8217;t forget the limited resolution of the human eye &#8230; and that already HDTV is mostly hype-driven &#8230;<br />
11. Mostly agree &#8230; even if new technologies might also help &#8230;<br />
12. I agree, but you do realize that for every consumer with a brain there are at least ten morons just dying to buy the latest gizmo from SteveJ :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Mertens</title>
		<link>http://unbeknownst.net/?p=234&#038;cpage=1#comment-74032</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Mertens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unbeknownst.net/?p=234#comment-74032</guid>
		<description>OLEDs have great advantages over LCDs or Plasma - not just the width. The have great viewing angle, they require much less power, they can be made transparent, or flexible. And they are much less &#039;complex&#039; to make, which means they will ultimately be cheaper... But it all takes time of course ;-)

Check out our OLED information site for more info - 

http://www.oled-info.com

Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OLEDs have great advantages over LCDs or Plasma &#8211; not just the width. The have great viewing angle, they require much less power, they can be made transparent, or flexible. And they are much less &#8216;complex&#8217; to make, which means they will ultimately be cheaper&#8230; But it all takes time of course ;-)</p>
<p>Check out our OLED information site for more info &#8211; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.oled-info.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.oled-info.com</a></p>
<p>Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
